We Don’t See The Dangers Of Driving Because Cars Have Brainwashed Us

The term “car brained” is used online to talk about people that can’t see the inherent dangers of driving and building our lives around cars

We may earn a commission from links on this page.
A photo of a car crashed through the wall of a parking lot.
Is the driver at fault, or the parking lot designer?
Photo: Theodore Parisienne for NY Daily News (Getty Images)

If you’re here at Jalopnik, there’s a good chance you like cars. Whether it’s driving them, talking about them or watching them race, we all came here because we’re fans. But surely we can still appreciate the dangers of driving, can’t we? Well, a new study says we might not and, in fact, it looks like we’re all brainwashed to ignore the risks associated with building our lives around driving.

The term given to this brainwashing online is “car brain,” which you might see batted around corners of the internet like r/fuckcars on Reddit.

Advertisement

This, according to The Atlantic, is a phrase used to describe people who will never see the flaws in driving and will, instead, believe that infrastructure must be changed to keep pedestrians or cyclists safe and away from cars. An example of this would be people calling on pedestrians to wear highly visible clothing following a spate of road deaths, rather than, say, cutting out the cause of crashes: cars.

And while you might think that’s an exaggerated example, it’s really something that policy makers and law enforcement wheel out every now and then.

Advertisement

But cars do more than just hit innocent pedestrians and cyclists, and a new study has found that we’re actually letting an awful lot slide because of our love of cars. The study looked at the allowances motorists made for cars in the UK and while car culture is a little different across the pond, a lot of the findings remain applicable to America as well.

A photo of a BMW crashed into a bollard.
Someone will argue that the bollard was at fault.
Photo: Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket (Getty Images)
Advertisement

To find out what kind of risks people will accept when behind the wheel, a team of scientist led by environmental psychology professor Ian Walker put a series of questions to UK road users. As The Atlantic explains:

“Walker and his team created pairs of questions designed to suss out the existence of a pro-car bias in society. The questions range from clever to somewhat chin-scratching. For instance, should people smoke cigarettes in highly populated areas where other people would have to breathe in the smoke? Forty-eight percent of respondents strongly agreed that they should not.

“Should people drive cars in highly populated areas where other people would have to breathe in the exhaust fumes? Only four percent strongly agreed that they should not. If you leave your car in the street and it gets stolen, is it your fault? Eighty-seven percent said no. If you leave anything else in the street and it gets stolen, is that your fault? Forty percent said yes.”

Advertisement

The findings of the study, Walker says, shows that we have “lost the ability to look at it objectively.”

Now, in 2023, it feels like we need to rediscover our critical thinking when it comes to cars. The Atlantic explains that an estimated 46,270 people were killed by cars in 2022, which was up by more than 18 percent over just three years previously.

Advertisement

Now, as cars get heavier and more powerful as we switch to electric vehicles, we really need to start paying attention to the inherent risks that come with driving and building our lives around cars. After all, just 88 people were killed by the New York City subway in 2022, compared with the 37,848 car crashes across the city that involved an injury or fatality.